The
Blue Ocean Strategy, was created by W. Chan Kim, in 1990, seeks to set aside
the competition among enterprises, expanding the market through innovation. Kim
and Mauborgne (K and M) said that "what companies need to achieve to be
successful in the future it is to stop competing with each other". They
divide current markets in two options; red markets and blue markets.
In the last twenty years, all the strategic
thinking has been directed to the red ocean; Administration defines that
competition is the success or failure of companies, which has allowed many know
perform ably in this world, but knowing that another type of strategy could
produce better results, without much concern for competition.
The red
ocean represents all existing industries today. These companies must be clearly
marked limits and the competencies defined, and their aim is to overcome the
opponent and gain a foothold in the market. They are constantly exposed to new
competitors, which diminish their growth potential. Usually this type of ocean
is the reality of any business. Blue ocean strategy focuses attention on the
creation of new markets at the product development stage.
The
concept is designed to encourage managers to focus on the creating of
uncontested markets.
Most
strategic models focus on achieving competitive advantages: the central
question being how to be better than the competition. The BOSM (Blue ocean
strategy model) does not focus on winning from competitors, but on making the
competition irrelevant by creating "blue ocean" opportunities. Blue
oceans are uncontested marketplaces in which new demands of customers are
satisfied (Kim and Mauborgne, 1997). Read oceans, in contrast, are competitive
arenas in which competitors fight and consequently weaken each other.
We can
list most important characteristics of these markets
Red
ocean Strategy (defend current position perspective)
Compete
in an existing market place.
Beat
the competition
Exploit
existing demand
Make
the value / cost trade-off
Align
the whole system of a firm’s activities with its strategic choice of
differentiation or low cost
Blue
ocean strategy (innovate and pursue new opportunities perspective)
Create
an uncontested marketplace
Make
the competition irrelevant
Create
and capture new demand
Beat
the value / cost trade – off
Align
the whole system of a firm’s activities in pursuit of differentiation and low
cost.
Examples
of blue markets are:
- Cirque du Soleil
- NetJets (arrendadora de aviones de negocios)
- Ralph Lauren
- Swatch
- Novo Nordisk (empresa farmacéutica danesa)
- Nabi
The
BOSM encourages innovation and influences the focus of strategy development.
Instead of using competitors as a benchmark, managers look beyond the limits of
existing market boundaries to seek new opportunities to create new value for
customers. Rather than trying to beat the competition directly, managers should
take actions to develop a business offering that opens up and captures a new
market space (Ki and M, 2005)
BOSM
adds direction to the strategic management process. Development strategy often focuses
solely on how to beat the competition. This will lead inevitably to a red ocean
scenario in which competitors fight and consequently weaken each other, in
order to direct the focus of strategy development towards the creation of blue
oceans, the management team needs to answer four questions:
- Which of the factors that our industry takes for granted should be eliminated?
- Which factors should be reduced well below the industry’s standard?
- Which factors should be raised well above the industry’s standard?
- Which factors should be created that the industry has never offered?
In this
process, it is essential to focus on what customers value, rather than merely
focusing on competitors or the core competencies of the firm. Instead, one
should start from scratch. By answering these questions, it is possible to
create entirely new concepts for products. As a result, a new so-called value
curve can be created. This curve determines a new value proposition, which
shows how the value of the new product differs from current products (K and M,
1997).
Two
types of Blue Ocean can be created using this process: either by launching a
completely new industry; or by creating new opportunities from within the
existing industry by expanding the strategic boundaries of the industry. Most
blue oceans are created this way.
BOS is
not a well-structured plan that is easy to implement. On the contrary, it is a
concept that can be used to focus strategic development (by answering the above
questions). Nevertheless, there are six core principles at the heart of BOS
that can be used as a guideline to tackle six key risks common to new product
development strategy, namely: search risk, planning risk, scope risk, business
model risks, organizational risk and management risk (Kim and Mauborgne, 2005).
The six blue ocean principles can be interpreted as an implementation guide for
creating uncontested markets.
The
first principle: reconstruct market boundaries identify commercially
compelling blue oceans in which the search risk is minimized.
The
second principle: focus on the big picture, not the numbers: tackle the
planning risks by focusing demand for a new offering.
The
fourth principle: get the strategic sequence right: reduce the business model
rusk by focusing on how to build a robust model that ensures long-term profit.
The
fifth principle: build execution into strategy: focus attention on the
motivation and use of the competencies of employees to execute BOS, thereby
overcoming management risk.
Regarding
everything mentioned above, the question to be answered is whether this
strategy can be used in all cases.
The
BOSM is a theoretical model that may be a revelation for many managers.
However, the model primarily describes what to do (on an abstract level)
instead of demonstrating how to for it. The model and related ideas are
descriptive rather than prescriptive. Moreover, the cases mentions by K and M
as examples of successful blue ocean innovations are interpreted through a
“blue ocean lens”, rather than being based on this model. Although K and M have
made a valuable contribution to strategic management literature, not all firms
should adopt this model. BOS may be a good strategy for many firms, but for
others a fast-moving strategy, cost leadership, differentiation or focus
strategy may be far more successful (Porter, 1979). K and M provide the
important insight that a firm can simultaneously pursue cost differentiation
and low costs.(Marcel Van Assen – Gerben Van den Berg & Paul Pletersma).
We hope
this summary has been to his liking. You may want to comment about it to help
us improve our publications.
Thank
you very much.
The dorbaires team
www.dorbaires.com
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario